Detect the demand
E-STOP, guard, light curtain, scanner or radar, motion feedback or access device.
Safety technology for new machinery, production equipment and machine modernisation—from E-STOP and guard monitoring through non-contact personnel protection, configurable safety control, Safe Motion and authorised access.
Begin with the hazard and the machine function, not the product family. The risk assessment defines the required safety function and the risk reduction it must achieve; the architecture then follows from detection, safe evaluation and the stopping element. Each route below leads to the the applicable manufacturer product families, the engineering criteria that govern selection, and the retrofit considerations for existing machinery.

Hardwired or modular evaluation of a bounded safety function — E-STOP, guard, two-hand or standstill — selected by input count, reset strategy, safe-output architecture and device lifecycle.

Interlocking, process guarding or personnel-protection guard locking, chosen from hazardous run-down time, manipulation protection, gate mechanics and the escape-release concept.

Electro-sensitive protective equipment for a defined access plane or a configurable area field, sized from resolution, approach direction and the minimum distance to ISO 13855.

Configurable or programmable safe logic, used once the number, interaction or distribution of safety functions exceeds what a clear relay architecture can carry.

Safe stop, speed, direction, position and brake functions — STO, SS1, SLS, SOS or SDI — through stand-alone monitoring, configurable control or a verified drive-integrated route.

Authentication, access permission and functionally safe operating-mode selection — kept distinct from the safety function itself and integrated through a verified controller architecture.
Note on device ratings. Performance Level to ISO 13849-1 or SIL to IEC 62061 applies to the complete safety-related control function — detection, evaluation, output and the machine response together. It is not a property of an individual device, and it cannot be inferred from a component rating alone.
Modernise the safety architecture without unnecessarily redesigning the machine. Review current protective devices, safety logic, outputs, stopping behaviour and access requirements, then establish what may remain and what must change.
Component capability does not establish the performance of the complete safety-related control function.
E-STOP, guard, light curtain, scanner or radar, motion feedback or access device.
PNOZ relay, PNOZmulti 2 or PSS 4000 selected for the architecture.
Contactor, drive STO, brake, safe valve or a supported safe drive function.
Defined stop or operating condition, including reset and restart behaviour.
Stop demand, evaluation, output switching, manual reset and restart prevention.
Interlocking or locking based on access, run-down time and guard mechanics.
Detection capability, safety distance, protective height, muting and reset.
Gate access, full-body entry, presence detection, teach mode and robot boundary.
Controlled setup or access using supported feedback and motion functions.
Lifecycle, additional devices, changed functions and modernised diagnostics.
Share the manufacturer, exact part number, application, supply, connected safety devices, available wiring information and a clear product photograph. A direct successor is proposed only where current manufacturer lifecycle information supports it; otherwise the safety function requires an architecture review.